(Source: wehuntmonsters, via communitythings)
Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will destroy the sanctity of traditional marriage.
Intelligent person: Well, what about divorce? Doesn’t divorce destroy the sanctity of traditional marriage as well? If so, why aren’t you against divorce? What about people like Kim Kardashian who get married for three months and then get divorced? Should we ban her from ever getting married again? I didn’t think so.
Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will open the doors to other types of marriage, like being able to marry your dog, family member, or several people at once.
Intelligent person: People thought the same thing about interracial marriage and it’s been legal for quite some time now. I don’t recall any doors being opened to interspecies marriage because of interracial marriage. Furthermore, there are several states that allow you to marry your first cousin and I believe that door was opened by traditional marriage, not gay marriage.
Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will redefine the word “marriage”.
Intelligent person: Words are redefined every day and people don’t seem to mind. If they redefined the word “marker”, would you protest it because “marker” has had a set definition for years? Switching around a few words so that same-sex couples are included in the definition cannot and will not affect your existing marriage in any way, shape, or form.
Conservative: Marriage is about reproducing. Two people of the same sex cannot reproduce.
Intelligent person: What about sterile men and infertile women? They’re still allowed to get married. Why not ban that as well? And if you want to get technical, gay couples can reproduce via a surrogate, but that’s probably a little too technical for you, Mr. Conservative.
Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will devalue existing traditional marriages.
Intelligent person: If two total strangers living several hundred miles away from you getting married affects your marriage somehow, then I don’t think your marriage was that strong to begin with.
Conservative: The Bible states that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Intelligent person: The Bible says a lot of things, but this country is not governed by what the Bible says. This country is governed by what the Constitution says and the first amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Conservative: Marriage and family go hand-in-hand. In order to properly raise a child, the child must have a mother and a father. If we legalize gay marriage and same-sex couples raise children, the children will grow up confused.
Intelligent person: A child does not need to have both a mother and a father in order to grow up secure and successful. If you don’t believe me, you can visit the man who lives in the White House. As for same-sex couples raising children, several scientific studies have concluded that being raised by same-sex parents does not affect a child’s self-esteem, gender identity, or emotional health.
Conservative: Gay marriage is against my religious belief and as an American I reserve the right to religious freedom.
Intelligent person: Really? Gays getting married will not take your religious freedom away. You’re allowed to believe in whatever you want, but you’re not allowed to try and impose your beliefs on me by trying to take my rights away. That is not religious freedom.
This is literally the dumbest shit I’ve seen in awhile. It is literally a big banner tumblr post shouting ‘Look! If you didn’t know already, liberals can be just as retarded as conservatives!’ and then it just goes on to circlejerk liberals until everyone’s cocks just fall right off. The number of Likes and reblogs on this post pretty much solidify that fact.
Like okay here we go, instead of making the conversation between ‘Intelligent Person’ and ‘Unintelligent Person’, (not that it would make it seem that much less pompous), the brilliant author decided ‘Well, all Conservatives are unintelligent and hold these views.’ What? Fuck you. I won’t play devil’s advocate here and pretend I’m conservative, but if you don’t recognize how incredibly childish and closed-minded that is, then you might actually have some kind of mental deficiency and I am worried for you.
Absolutely, the views expressed by the ‘Conservative’ in this post are incorrect, ill informed, and unfortunately held by many people who associate themselves with that end of the political spectrum, but this dialogue takes it a step further and either assumes, or intends to make the reader assume that they are views held by all people who fall into the right wing of the political spectrum.
It may surprise you to know that many people, from either end of the spectrum, can associate themselves with one political ideal, but still have issues which are closer to the heart which are supported only by parties on the exact opposite end of the spectrum. For example, from my own standpoint, I have very left leaning political views, except on one issue: gun control. Every left leaning political party is absolutely terrified of guns for some stupid reason and thus support gun control despite the fact that it is an enormous waste of money, and actually serves to make citizens less safe in all statistical information. In the case of gun control, I hold views which might be considered very conservative. Does it make me a conservative to hold those views? Absolutely not.
Similarly, I know not just one, but a rather diverse group of people who happen to vote conservative despite the fact that they do not at all feel that gay marriage should be illegal, or anything of the sort. In fact, not only is at least one person gay themselves, but several of them are religious. One of them is a pastor at a local church. They vote conservative because where I come from, the conservative party tends to cater to our area a bit better than left leaning parties do especially in terms of fiscal growth. Even though it’s not my view personally, I can’t fault people for wanting to hold on to the money they make.
Anyway, whoever wrote this is a massive dipshit, and the same goes for every single person that reblogged it or Liked it.
(Source: anthagio)
| Rylee: | tfn |
|---|---|
| Rylee: | i wish you would stop talking and make me a fucking sandwich |
| PALMS PUPPINGTON: | wash my pants while you're at it |
| tom k: | i did make you a sandwich |
| tom k: | go ahead |
| tom k: | take a bite |
| Rylee: | well okay |
| Rylee: | wait |
| tom k: | did you take a bite |
| Rylee: | AW GROSS |
| Rylee: | THIS SANDWICH IS FILLED WITH SHIT |
| tom k: | I SHIT IN THE SANDWICH |
| tom k: | LMAO |
| tom k: | HAHAHAAHAH |
| tom k: | FUCK YOU |
| Rylee: | WHAT THE FUCK TFN |
| tom k: | STUPID FUCKING PIG OF A MAN |
No wonder no one takes the Canadian military seriously.
“Where’s the maple syrup, eh?”
Let’s Read: Youtube comments!
This is just fantastic, really:

Watch out guys, one day you’ll wake up one day “[staring] down the barrel [of a gun, presumably held by] a Chink” and you’ll say “WTF happened??”
Liberalisms is what happened, IDIOT.
(Source: karomeled, via communitythings)
(Source: clickidyclick, via buttkracken)
This is just the greatest thing.




1
